The
citizens of Mexico City (above) had been hearing echoes of the bugles from the approaching Chasseurs de Vincinnes for a week. It was their looming threat
which drove the 12,000 defenders of the Mexican Republic to abandon their
capital on the last day of May. If the “Hunters of Vincinnes”
had pushed, they could have sauntered into the capital that,
Saturday, 1, June, 1863.
Instead they took their time. The campaign
had already been set back a year by recklessness and arrogance. This
time French General Élie Frédéric Forey was taking nothing for granted.
He judged it better for the residents of the Mexican capital to sniff
the rot of anarchy first. After which the boot about to be applied
to their necks, would seem a welcomed stability.
In
the beginning it had all been about money. Having been forced to an
expensive suppression of an 1860 rebellion by the wealthy and the
church, the new reform President Benito Juarez, declared a 2 year
moratorium on international debt payments. But the bankers in London,
Madrid and Paris were not interested in the stability of Mexico. They
dispatched ships and troops to seize the Gulf of Mexico port of Veracruz, to use as
leverage.
United
States bankers had also made loans to the Juarez government, and the
aggrieved Europeans offered to include American debt in their ransom
for Veracruz. American Secretary of State William Seward (above) might
have invoked the 40 year old Monroe Doctrine. Mexico clearly fit its
definition of a government, “...who
have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose
independence we have... acknowledged...” In such cases the United
States was supposed to see any foreign intervention “... for the
purpose of oppressing them, or controlling...their destiny...as the
manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.”
Several
other beneficiaries of the Monroe Doctrine - recently liberated
colonies in south and central America – sought United States
leadership in a unified resistance to the Mexican intervention. And
the mind boggles at the possible future of the western hemisphere if
that option had been explored. But such a course of action never had
a chance of being taken. The slave states' bloody Götterdämmerung precluded
such a gradual political evolution on anybody's part.
The
United States was consumed by a civil war costing its 19 million
northern citizens $2.5 million dollars - in 1863 - and 133 lives on average, every day. Given that distraction, Seward and Lincoln could only respond to the
European offer with a “thanks, but no thanks”, and a bit of
groveling. “The President does not feel himself at liberty to
question, and he does not question, that the sovereigns....have the
undoubted right to decide...whether they have sustained grievances,
and to resort to war with Mexico for the redress thereof...”
Both Lincoln and Seward also seemed to understand that the 3 nation
alliance was unlikely to hold together for long. And even before the
shooting started in the Charleston harbor, Charles-Louis
Napoléon Bonaparte, aka Napoleon III Emperor of France, showed
that he was more interested in empire building than in debt
collecting. The still young Queen Victoria was driven lecture
her own foreign minister, “The conduct of the French is everywhere
disgraceful. Let us only have nothing to do with them in future.”
It
did not matter. When his allies pulled out of the alliance early in
1862, Napoleon carried on alone, pushing the 6,000 man army of the smug, certain Charles-Ferdinand Latrille, Comte de Lorencez (above) , up the 250 mile
invasion route previously followed by Cortés.
First he marched
southwest to the town of Cotaxla on the Rio Jamapa. Then up that
river to Cordoba. Another single days march took Lorencez's army to
the Metlac River.
Crossing this and turning southwest, brought him to
the village of Orizaba, at the foot of the Acultzingo pass, squeezed
between 10,000 foot summits. On 27 April, 1862, Lorencez pushed aside
a Mexican force there, and gained access to the central “cold
country”, where his men need no longer fear malaria.
By
5 May, 1862, Lorencez was facing the highland city of Peubla,
founded by Franciscan monks. The local landowners and clergy
assured the Comte that the city would eagerly surrender. But the
local peasants volunteered to defend their republic. Their commander,
33 year old General Ignacio Zaragoza, told his men, ““Our enemies
may be the world’s best soldiers, but you are the best sons of
Mexico”.
Two
times the French artillery pummeled the forts and three times the
infantry attacked. And 3 times the Mexican peasant soldiers threw
them back.
Then, as the exhausted French retreated the last time,
Zaragoza unleashed the young Porfirio Diaz and his 650 lancers.
Without artillery support, the French were scattered and driven back
in confusion. Only a sudden thunderstorm which turned the battlefield
into mud, and an unexpected escarpment, blocking the Mexican cavalry,
saved the French army.
The
French admitted to 460 causalities, the Mexican's half that number.
Cinco de Mayo became a Mexican national holiday, and the city was
renamed Puebla de Zaragoza. The French retreated 90 miles back to
the pass before Orizaba, where the Comte Lorencez contracted malaria.
And then in September, reinforcements arrived from France, including
the 59 year old professional General Forey. The fever stricken Comte
Lorencez returned home.
This time Forey's army was 24,000 men
strong. This time they were accompanied by 2,000 Mexican imperialist
soldiers. This time the 22,000 Mexican Republicans defending Peubla
were without the genius of General Zaragoza, who died typhoid fever
in February of 1863. And this time, in March, the French army
surrounded the town. By 16 May, 1863 – just as Grant was grasping
the city of Vicksburg in his hands - the defenders of Peubla were
starved into surrender. They laid down their guns and went home. The
next day, the Chasseurs de
Vincinnes began a slow careful march on Mexico city.
First
they turned northwest to Santa Rita, on the Rio Tlahuapan. Westward
was the village of Rio Frio de Juarz , which sat at the eastern edge
of the El Guardio pass, between Monte Taloc and the strato-volcano
Iztaccihuati. In front of the hunters was now is the plain of Mexico
City. But keeping the Cinco de Mayo of 1862 in mind, General Forey (above) remained cautious.
Not
until 10 June, 1863, did the French army paraded through the streets
of the Mexican capital. They crossed under an endless series of
flowered triumphal arches, at almost every street corner. Bells rang
from every cathedral and church. Priests and nuns were singing
hosannas all along the parade route. The wealthy landowners and the
professional businessmen were cheering. But the peasants continued to
resist.
Secretary
Seward was of the opinion that “...the destinies of the American
continent are not to be permanently controlled by the political
arrangements...in the capitals of Europe.” Moreover, he felt
certain the Mexican people would never accept the imported younger
brother of an Austrian Archduke as their Emperor, particularly when that choice was dictated by the Emperor of France (above). And America refused
to recognize the French backed government of Ferdinand
Maximilian. Worse, no European government was willing to finance the
French intervention.
Meanwhile,
Seward calculated the
United States could prolong France's Mexican intervention through
loans to the Mexican state, at least until America would “... be
able to rise without great effort to the new duties which in that
case will have devolved upon us.” In other words, as soon as the
rebellion of the slave states had been defeated.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your reaction.