I am still angry with John Quincy
Adams (above). Yes, he has been dead for 164 years, perhaps the only man to
have died in the offices of the Speaker of the House of
Representatives. But whenever I think about what he did not do, I
want to go back to 1828, and just slap him. Its not that he was
without honor. He remains the only President who left the White House
and then served 18 years in Congress. And the current craze for large
expensive Presidential libraries began with the modest one built in
his honor, by his son Francis. But then, I guess Francis felt the
need to honor his father, since he was partly responsible for John Q.
being a one term President. Not that Charles was to blame, but he was
responsible. John Quincy Adams was the Adams to blame for his
abbreviated Presidency.
See, in 1809, John Quincy was the first
American Ambassador to Russia. But as a diplomat John Quincy had only
two qualifications. First, he was very, very
smart. And second, he was his father's son. Having accompanied John
Adams to Paris to represent the Continental Congress during the
revolution, and after the war, to England, John Q was the best
trained diplomat in America. On the negative side, neither his father
nor John Quincy had the personality for the job. He would later
describe himself in his own diary as a “man of reserved, cold,
austere, and forbidding manners.” If it hadn't been for his wife,
the vivacious and politically astute English-born Louisa, (above) John Q. would have been
a complete failure as a diplomat. But even she found the Adams men
“cold and insensitive”. Louisa's regrets, and her migraine
headaches, may have had something to do with John Quincy's parenting
skills. He had none. Both of his older sons became alcoholics.
Anyway, when in 1809 President James
Madison appointed John Quincy as ambassador to Russia, Louisa had to
leave the older boys at home, and drag two year old Charles on the 80
day sea voyage to St. Petersburg. Louisa brought along her
chambermaid, Martha Godfry, who would also serve as Charles' nurse.
John Q described Martha as “a very beautiful girl”, and it seems
she must have been pleasant as well. In any case, Martha also played
her part in the future political troubles of President John Q.
Martha was from a servant class family,
and sent a letter back to her mother in Boston, saying she had
arrived safely, and how magnificent the Romanov court was, and how
handsome the Czar (above) was, and how the women at court practically
fainted if he looked at them. Well, the Russian secret police were
just as efficient in the 19th century as they would be
under the Communists, and they opened Martha's letters. And since the
writing was complementary of the Czar, they copied Martha's letters,
and showed the copies to Czar Alexander I. The Czar was flattered,
and hearing the girl was pretty, he concocted a way to meet her. He
contrived to have the daughter of one of his visiting in-laws, the
young princess Amelia of Baden, invite Charles to a play date. And
when Martha arrived with the boy, the Czar just happened to stop by
for a quick visit. He brought along his German wife, Elizabeth (below), as
cover.
Alexander spent a few minutes talking
to the boy, and tried to strike up a conversation with the beautiful
Martha. But either she was too nervous or too naive, or he did not
find her as attractive as John Q did, or maybe the Czarina smelled
the testosterone in the room, but in any case after this brief
encounter, Charles and Martha were never invited back. Alexander went
back to his mistress, Maria Antonovna Naryshkina, and Czarina Elizabeth
went back to her lover, Adam Czartoryski. As for Martha, after she
was debriefed by John Q. - who managed to miss the entire subtext
of the encounter – she was allowed to retreat to her bedroom, where
she composed a detailed letter to her Mother of the exciting day she
actually spoke to the Russian Czar. The secret police must have been
sorely disappointed with that month's American diplomatic pouch.
All of that, remember, was twenty years
in the past, when President John Q arrived in Baltimore on the
afternoon of Sunday, October 14, 1827 – 5 months after Roger Tawny
and friends met to plot the President's defeat. The President had sailed down the
Chesapeake Bay to dedicate a memorial to the 1814 Battle of
Baltimore, but took the opportunity to do a little politicking.
Noting the town was also constructing the nation's first memorial to
George Washington, he called Baltimore the “city of monuments”,
knowing the phrase would stick. He even stayed over an extra day, to
attend the funeral of Revolutionary War hero, General John
Edgar Howard. And that night John Q spent three hours shaking hands and
speaking with some 2,000 locals.
In 1824 Baltimore had gone heavily for
Jackson, but logic seemed to dictate the town should support Adams in
1828. The city was the starting point for the Cumberland Highway,
now called the National Road. This had been the dream of George
Washington, and already snaked west through the mountains toward
Pittsburgh. Paid for with high tariffs on imported goods, John Q
wanted to push it across the Ohio border to the Mississippi River,
binding the nation together ideologically and economically. And
Baltimore would be the Atlantic port for everything that came down
that road.
And then there was the Chesapeake and
Ohio Canal; also partly paid for with tariff revenues, and well begun in 1827, snaking west to the headwaters of the Ohio
River. It also began in Baltimore, and with the Wabash and Erie Canal in far
off Indiana, would draw corn and pork grown on the frontier down its stone lined walls to be
shipped through Baltimore, and then to the world.
And now, the Baltimore and
Ohio Railroad, raising funds and laying plans, intended, someday, to
connect by steel the farms and mines of the Mississippi Valley
directly to Baltimore. The Baltimore American urged the city to
“imitate the spider and spread her lines towards every point of the
compass...The present generation are able to pay interest; let the
next generation pay the principle.”
That last sentence was a perfect encapsulation for John
Q's “American System”, and a century later, President
Eisenhower's interstate highway system - investing in infrastructure
today, so future generations could enjoy the harvest. The next
evening, after another full day, John Q was the guest of honor at a
dinner of the Society of the Cincinnati, named
after the Roman Senator who left his plow to lead soldiers of the
Republic, and then returned to his farm. This night John Q gave the
final toast, to “Baltimore, the Monumental City (above) - may the days of
her safety be as prosperous and happy as the days of her danger have
been trying and triumphant!” It was an optimistic view of the
nation's future. But there were men, like Roger Tawny, who preferred
to look backward and saw nothing but threats in the future. And they
would do whatever needed to be done to ensure the future did not
come.
In far off Concord, New Hampshire,
resided a man often accused of being demented, insane and mad – the
lunatic's name was Isaac Hill (above). He had been owner and editor of the
weekly newspaper, The Patriot, since 1809, and while serving in the New Hampshire legislature had developed a
reputation as a gadfly and political arsonist. He also saw nothing promising in the future. Readers were
entertained by his vitriol, vendettas and conspiracies - he was a sort of Michelle Bachmann in knee britches. He called Secretary-of-State Henry Clay, “a shyster, pettifogging in a bastard
suit before a country squire" - meaning the President, John Q. Adams.” Hill saw
the National Road as a violation of the Constitution, because it
spent tariffs collected in New England, to build a road in
Pennsylvania. He saw Adam's American System of internal improvements as a power grab. You get
the feeling he hated Adams more because Adams was popular in New
England, while Isaac Hill was not.
And it was as the election of 1828
approached, that The Patriot ran a biographical sketch of Andrew
Jackson, in which the 38 year old Isaac Hill told the world John
Quincy Adams was a pimp. It seems, said Hill, that while serving as
America's ambassador to Russia, John Q had presented an innocent
American servant girl, to be ravaged by the Czar. The accusation
exploded across anti-Adams newspapers like a wild fire. The story had
everything for Adams haters – sex, as only a puritan New Englander could enjoy it, with disapproval- degenerate European royalty
– who prayed to a bizarre God at that - Adams as a stuck up prude
willing to compromise his scruples for success, and a innocent
American maiden, giving up her naked body only to force.
It took John Q a little time to figure
out Hill was writing about Martha Godfry, and her innocent brief
encounter from twenty years earlier. But when he did, the truth was
rushed into print. The only problem was, the truth had no sex, no
degenerate royalty, no tension or dramatic structure. And thus the
truth made for really bad politics. And Adams did not speak out about
it, did not address the smear in public, nor did he demand that
Jackson denounce Hill as a fraud and madman. And, in much the same
way as in 2004, when candidate Senator John Kerry did not denounce the so
called Swift Boat Veterans and POW's for Truth, the case against him sat as an unanswered accusation. In the latter case a
decorated military veteran had his courage questioned. And in 1828, a
long standing patriot, John Quincy Adams, had his honor questioned.
Somebody should have punched John Q
right in the nose. Because he thought it was beneath him, to defend himself against such an accusation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your reaction.