I believe we will create a better
world, someday – just probably not while I am still breathing in
it. My personal philosophy is a “depressed
optimist”. Case in point: recent research of the 3 inch fossil Fuxianhuia protensa, (above) has
postulated that about half a billion years ago, as the autotrophs
were beginning to drool,
they suffered a glitch during
mitosis or meiosis, or some sort of reproduction, and begot a double
pair of a particular genomic sequence in their proto-brains, and then
passed that “oops” down to their daughter cells. As Neanderthals
developed tools, this “double dose” of DNA strands gave rise to
higher brain functions. Evidently, it also gave rise to crazy.
As one brainiac involved in this study
put it, “The price of higher intelligence and more complex
behaviors is more mental illness.” What this implies is that
whether you are studying religion or astronomy, Descartes or
Deuteronomy, you are ingesting a degree of insanity right along with
all the knowledge you acquire. The ability to use fire allowed us to break down
meat proteins, but that also bestows the ability to burn down the
house you live in. And we do it all the time – ask any Tea Party
Member. Music or mythology, Einstein or astrology, nothing that
humans have ever invented could not be used to destroy humans. Why
should the Internet be any different from that?
You see some idiots have exploited a
“hole” in the Java software system, putting, according to the
United States Department of Homeland Security, one billion computers
at risk, both Apple and Windows systems, and Chrome, Firefox, Safari
and Explorer browsers. According to TechNews Daily, Java has offered
an emergency fix, but it means “ users will have to
approve every single instance of Java that they encounter online.” In other words, the $8 trillion web is being destroyed because
somebody found out a way to make 50 cents profit by blowing it up.
My question is , what kind of idiot
would try to make a profit from destroying all future profits? But the answer is obvious. The same kind of idiots who blew
up the world wide economic system in 1929 and again in 2007, the
same kind of idiots who are currently running the National Rifle
Association, seemingly determined to convince the vast majority of
Americans that the terms “gun owner” and “gun nut” are
synonymous. As a famous fictional American once said, “Stupid is as
stupid does”.
On the plus side, I also recently came across research from South Africa and Sweden, which reveals that the average
dung beetle uses GPS in rolling their poop balls back home. But this
G in GPS does not stand for global, but for galactic. We've always known that once the lady beetle gets a nice
juicy ball of dung together, they climb on top and do a little dance. Entomologists assumed it was the beetle's way of saying to the universe
“This ball of crap is mine!” But now it seems they are actually
seeking to orientate themselves so they can find their way back to
the burrow. If the sun is up, they use the sun. At night they use
the moon. And on moonless nights they use the Milky Way, that smear
of billions of stars that runs across the night sky, that nobody ever figured a dung beetle was even aware of..
According to Professor Marcus
Bryne, from Wits University in Johannesburg, “The dung beetles
don't care which direction they're going in; they just need to get
away from the big fight with the other beetles at the poo pile.” And there appears to be a lesson on the relationship
between Newtonian and Quantum physics here. The beetles can use the
Milky Way to define a straight line back to their burrows, because
they are so small, and the Milky Way is so far away. However, a moth,
using the same basic methodology, circles a flame because they are
bigger and closer to the light source. In other words, the moths
think they are flying in a straight line, as long as they keep the
light at an equal distance. Its the difference between walking from New York and Los Angeles, and flying there. It's the Flatland thought experiment, but with moths and poop, rather than circles and triangles.
But to get back to my original
example, Fuxianhuia protensa, has been described as a
“missing link”, or more accurately as “a mistaken link”. The
problem is the little multi-legged beetle, which an average human
would instantly step on if they spotted it in their closet, might
have been the ancestor of all bugs – crickets, cockroaches,
beetles, moths and lice. But it also might not. I probably better explain my last statement, or rather let Professor
Nicholas Strausfeld from the University of Virginia explain it.
“There has been a very long debate about the origin of insects,”
he says. And that, it seems, explains everything.
See, to put it simply, the grandaddy of
all buggies was either a crab or a sea monkey (brine shrimp if
you are over the age of twelve). Crabs are crustaceans, and sea monkey's are
branchiopods. Crabs have much more complex bodies than do sea
monkeys. So, ancient sea monkeys were thought to have evolved into
insects, while ancient crabs evolved into everybody else. Or so the thinking used to go. But then
along comes Fuxianhuia protensa, with a squiggly body and an
organized brain, and a dependable dated age of 520 million years
old. And that is old enough to have been the
great-great-great-etcettera-granddaddy of both – which means that life got smart and then found it might be more advantageous to get
stupid again, but with fewer legs..
I can dig that. I can even empathize
with how the little buggies felt. Every human male reaches some point in
their lives when they realize that women often prefer bastards to
nice guys. As your father might have told you at that point, “Life
isn't fair”, and he may even have asked you, “If you ever figure
women out, will let me know?” To put it in a more gender neutral
way, most people reach a point when they suspect that their brains
are just getting in the way of their hormones making them happy. And
it appears that sometime in the Cambrian period, the squiggly crawly
things wiggling across the ocean floor first confronted that basic
philosophical conundrum: brains or balls? Which way will I go?
At that point it now appears that the
balls returned to a simpler brain and instant gratification, while the
brains tried deferred reward. And the amazing thing is, it appears we
both ended up in the same place, standing atop a pile of our own shit and
looking to the Milky Way for direction.
It's enough to make anybody a depressed
optimist.
- 30 -
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your reaction.